亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

鮮棗可溶性固形物可見/近紅外光譜檢測建模方法比較
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項(xiàng)目:

高等學(xué)校博士學(xué)科點(diǎn)專項(xiàng)科研基金資助項(xiàng)目(20101403110003)


Comparison of Modeling Methods of Fresh Jujube Soluble Solids Measurement by NIR Spectroscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    對采摘于一棗園的180個壺瓶棗樣本,隨機(jī)分成150個樣本校正集和30個樣本預(yù)測集。用Field Spec3光譜儀采集光譜,并進(jìn)行多元散射校正(MSC)預(yù)處理,之后分別利用連續(xù)投影算法(SPA)和逐步回歸法(SRA)提取特征波長,并結(jié)合光譜理論分析確定,再分別基于偏最小二乘法(PLS)和最小二乘—支持向量機(jī)(LS—SVM)建立壺瓶棗可溶性固形物含量預(yù)測的簡化模型和全波段模型。結(jié)果表明,全波段PLS模型預(yù)測的相關(guān)系數(shù)和預(yù)測均方根誤差分別為0.8874和1.0889,預(yù)測效果最好;建立的MSC—SPA—PLS模型預(yù)測的相關(guān)系數(shù)和均方根誤差分別為0.7990和1.4078,建立的MSC—SRA—PLS模型預(yù)測的相關(guān)系數(shù)和均方根誤差分別為0.8224和1.3851,與全波段的MSC—PLS相比,精度均降低;建立的MSC—SPA—LS—SVM模型預(yù)測的相關(guān)系數(shù)和均方根誤差分別為0.7963和1.1458,與全波段的MSC—LS—SVM相比,精度提高;建立的MSC—SRA—LS—SVM模型預(yù)測精度很低,不適用。

    Abstract:

    Totally 180 samples coming from one orchard were divided into calibration set with 150 samples and prediction set with 30 samples. Field Spec3 spectrometer was used for collecting spectra data of 180 fresh jujube samples separately. Then successive projection algorithm and stepwise regression analysis combined with spectral theory were used to process the spectral data after MSC pretreatment. Characteristic wavelengths of 150 samples in calibration set were selected by using SPA and SRA, and the partial least square (PLS) and LS—SVM methods were used to establish models of the fresh jujube soluble solids with the whole spectrum and characteristic wavelengths selected by using SPA and SRA. At last, the models of MSC—PLS model, MSC—LS—SVM model, the MSC—SPA—PLS model, the MSC—SPA—LS—SVM model, the MSC—SRA—PLS model and the MSC—SRA—LS—SVM model were used to predict the soluble solids of 30 samples in the prediction set. The results showed that the correlation coefficient and the root mean square error of prediction of MSC—PLS model for full band are 0.8874 and 1.0889 and that is the best. The correlation coefficient and the root mean square error of prediction of MSC—SPA—PLS model and MSC—SRA—PLS model are 0.7990, 1.4078 and 0.8224, 1.3851, and they are less precise than the MSC—PLS model. The correlation coefficient and the root mean square error of prediction of MSC—SPA—LS—SVM model are 0.7963 and 1.1458, and that is more precise than the MSC—LS—SVM model. The precision of MSC—SRA—LS—SVM model is very low and is not suitable.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

張淑娟,張海紅,趙艷茹,趙華民.鮮棗可溶性固形物可見/近紅外光譜檢測建模方法比較[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報,2012,43(3):108-112. Zhang Shujuan, Zhang Haihong, Zhao Yanru, Zhao Huamin. Comparison of Modeling Methods of Fresh Jujube Soluble Solids Measurement by NIR Spectroscopy[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2012,43(3):108-112.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2012-03-17
  • 出版日期: