亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

不同生育時期冬小麥FPAR高光譜遙感監(jiān)測模型研究
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

國家高技術研究發(fā)展計劃(863計劃)資助項目(2013AA102902)和國家自然科學基金資助項目(31071374、30771280)


FPAR Monitoring Model of Winter Wheat Based on Hyperspectral Reflectance at Different Growth Stages
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    通過連續(xù)5年定位研究不同氮磷耦合水平下,不同生育時期冬小麥群體FPAR與冠層光譜反射率,建立基于不同植被指數(shù)的不同生育時期FPAR分段監(jiān)測模型。結果表明:隨著氮磷水平增加FPAR呈遞增趨勢,不同品種間存在差異;冬小麥群體FPAR與670、850、960nm具有較高的相關性,在可見光和近紅外波段處均有敏感波段;在拔節(jié)期、孕穗期、抽穗期、灌漿期和成熟期FPAR與SAVI、NDVI705、EVI、RVI、RVI均達極顯著相關,相關系數(shù)r范圍為0.818~0.942;在不同生育時期,分別基于SAVI、NDVI705、EVI、RVI、RVI能建立較好的FPAR分段監(jiān)測模型,決定系數(shù)R2分別為0.854、0.888、0.811、0.844、0.911;標準誤差SE分別為0.054、0.032、0.044、0.047、0.044;以不同年份獨立數(shù)據(jù)對模型進行驗證,田間實測值與模型預測值之間相對誤差RE分別為14.1%、17.4%、12.8%、18.8%、10.7%;均方根誤差RMSE分別為0.139、0.146、0.136、0.158、0.130。該結果較拔節(jié)期至成熟期FPAR統(tǒng)一監(jiān)測模型監(jiān)測精度及驗證效果均有所改善。因此,在拔節(jié)期、孕穗期、抽穗期、灌漿期和成熟期可分別用SAVI、NDVI705、EVI、RVI、RVI預測冬小麥群體FPAR,具有較好的年度間重演性和品種間適用性。不同生育時期FPAR分段監(jiān)測模型較統(tǒng)一監(jiān)測模型有較好的監(jiān)測效果。

    Abstract:

    Hyperspectral remote sensing is an important technique to fulfill real-time monitoring for crop growth status based on its superior performance in acquiring vegetation canopy information rapidly and non-destructively. The objective of this study was to establish the best simulating accuracy and adaptability of wheat fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) estimation model based on wheat canopy hyperspectral reflectance with different nitrogen or phosphorus application rate treatments, and to improve the forecast precision of the FPAR estimation model at different growth stages of dryland wheat on the Loess Plateau. The experiments were carried out during 2009—2014 at Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China. Different winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties with stronge or weak drought resistance were chosen for the treatments in different years, nitrogen and phosphorus treatments included five nitrogen fertilizer application rates (0, 75, 150, 225 and 300kg/hm2 pure nitrogen, expressed as N) and four phosphorus application rates (0, 60, 120 and 180kg/hm2P2O5,expressed as P), the FPAR and canopy hyperspectral reflectance of different varieties and fertilizer treatments were monitored at jointing, booting,heading, grain filling and maturity stage, respectively. Then FPAR monitoring models at different growth stages of winter wheat were constructed by using correlation analysis, regression analysis and other methods. The results showed that the FPAR of wheat increased with nitrogen and phosphorus application rate increasing in different growth stages, there were significant differences among test cultivars. A good correlation relationship was presented between FPAR and canopy spectral reflectance at 670, 850 and 960nm, and the sensitive band of the FPAR occurred mostly within visible and near-infrared spectrum. The correlations between soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), red edge normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI705), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), difference vegetation index (DVI) and ratio vegetation index (RVI) to FPAR were significant, and the range of correlation coefficient was 0.818~0.942 at jointing, booting, heading, filling and maturity stages. Monitoring models based on SAVI, NDVI70, EVI, RVI and RVI produced better estimation for FPAR at different growth stages, and the determination coefficients (R2) were 0.854, 0.888, 0.811, 0.844 and 0.911, and the standard errors (SE) were 0.054, 0.032, 0.044, 0.047 and 0.044, accordingly. Meanwhile, comparing the predicted value with measured value to verify reliability and applicability of monitoring model, result showed that the relative errors (RE) between measured value and predicted value were 14.1%, 17.4%, 12.8%, 18.8%, 10.7%, and the root mean square errors (RMSE) were 0.139, 0.146, 0.136, 0.158, 0.130, respectively. Therefore, it was suggested the vegetation indices of SAVI, NDVI705, EVI, RVI and RVI was the most suitable model for monitoring winter wheat FPAR at jointing, booting, heading, filling and maturity stages, respectively, and there was higher prediction precision with different vegetation indices in monitoring FPAR of winter wheat at different growth stages, and different N and P rates. These conclusions had important implications for the large areas FPAR monitoring of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau. Meanwhile, there was a higher prediction accuracy of monitoring model based on the different vegetation indices at different growth stages.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

賀佳,劉冰峰,李軍.不同生育時期冬小麥FPAR高光譜遙感監(jiān)測模型研究[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機械學報,2015,46(2):261-269,275. He Jia, Liu Bingfeng, Li Jun. FPAR Monitoring Model of Winter Wheat Based on Hyperspectral Reflectance at Different Growth Stages[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2015,46(2):261-269,275.

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2015-02-10
  • 出版日期: 2015-02-10
文章二維碼