亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

生物質混燃在農(nóng)村能源供應中應用分析
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

農(nóng)業(yè)行業(yè)標準項目(181721301092371112)


Application of Biomass Co-combustion in Rural Daily Energy Supply
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    通過對比生物質、燃煤及兩者1∶1的混合燃料在燃煤爐具中采暖及炊事兩種工況下的能量效率、排放特征及經(jīng)濟性能,具體量化生物質混燃的技術優(yōu)勢,為清潔低廉的生物質能在農(nóng)村地區(qū)的推廣提供理論依據(jù)。結果顯示,在燃煤爐具中混合燃料燃燒時的能源效率明顯高于生物質燃料,且其采暖工況效率高于炊事工況效率近20%。相比于燃煤,混燃時主要氣態(tài)污染物SO2、NO、NO2綜合減排效果良好,PM2.5排放量遠低于國標限值(100mg/MJ)。其主要有機污染排放PAHs也能得到有效控制,尤其是高環(huán)PAHs在采暖和炊事工況下的減排率可分別達到34%和87%。而相比于生物質,混燃時CO排放較少,在采暖工況下減排率為46%,炊事工況則為61%。此外由于人為操作較少,采暖工況下的污染排放量較為穩(wěn)定?;旌先剂蟽r格較低,單位能量價格為0.039元/MJ,而單位質量價格僅為燃煤的1/2,燃燒器可使用低成本燃煤爐具,避免使用價格昂貴的生物質專用爐具,可確保低收入家庭居民日常用能支出維持在經(jīng)濟承受能力范圍之內(nèi)。

    Abstract:

    China has abundant biomass equal to over four million tons of standard coal, which can directly substitute coal in residential energy system. The focus was to quantify performances of household biomass co-combustion by comparing energy efficiency, emission characteristics and economic value of biomass, coal and co-fuel in a typical coal-burning stove under space-heating and cooking phase to promote clean and cheap biomass energy in rural areas. The results indicated that energy efficiency of co-fuel was much higher than that of biomass in coal-fire stove with a value of 68.10% in heating phase and 54.50% in cooking phase. The gaseous pollutant of SO2, NO and NO2 emitted from co-combustion were reduced significantly compared with coal burning, and PM2.5 was decreased to a low concentration which was much lower than the limiting value (100mg/MJ) of Chinese standard. The emission reduction of SO2, NO, NO2 and PM2.5 was 22%, 67%, 88% and 18%, respectively, in heating phase, while the reduction emission was 11%, 64%, 63% and 33%, respectively, in cooking phase. The organic emissions of US-EPA priority PAHs with high carcinogenicity were also controlled well and the emission reduction of high-ring PAHs could reach 34% and 87% in heating and cooking phases. Compared with biomass in coal-fire stove, the emission of CO from co-fuel combustion was low with the reduction of 46% in heating phase and 61% in cooking phase. Moreover, the emission levels under heating phase were more stable than cooking phase due to relatively less artificial operations. The co-fuel was cheap, whose price on a unit energy basis was 0.039yuan/MJ and the price on a unit mass basis was only half of coal. The burner of co-fuel was popular coal-burning stove, avoiding purchasing expensive biomass stove and ensuring the expenditure for daily energy uses within the economic bearing capacity of low-income families. 

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

周宇光,趙楠,李博文,巴哈爾古力·托哈尼亞孜,陳德穎,董仁杰.生物質混燃在農(nóng)村能源供應中應用分析[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機械學報,2018,49(s1):407-412. ZHOU Yuguang, ZHAO Nan, LI Bowen, BAHARGUL Tohniyaz, CHEN Deyin, DONG Renjie. Application of Biomass Co-combustion in Rural Daily Energy Supply[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2018,49(s1):407-412.

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2018-11-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二維碼