亚洲一区欧美在线,日韩欧美视频免费观看,色戒的三场床戏分别是在几段,欧美日韩国产在线人成

典型草原自然保護地景觀空間彈性GIS評價
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

國家重點研發(fā)計劃項目(2018YFC0507303)和內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)自然科學(xué)基金項目(2017BS0403)


Evaluation of Spatial Elasticity of Landscape in Typical Grassland Nature Reserve by GIS
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    為了解草原植被恢復(fù)效果和理解草原生態(tài)系統(tǒng)彈性特征,以錫林郭勒草原國家級自然保護區(qū)為對象,在ArcGIS、Fragstats等軟件支持下,從景觀格局穩(wěn)定性(LPS)、生態(tài)敏感性(LES)和人類活動干擾3個維度建立概念化景觀空間彈性模型(LSR),分析評價了研究區(qū)景觀空間生態(tài)敏感性和彈性特征。研究結(jié)果表明:草地、林地等景觀格局穩(wěn)定性較高,尤其是核心區(qū),但LPS值遠低于理論最優(yōu)值,亟待提升;自然保護區(qū)內(nèi)近60%的景觀空間生態(tài)敏感性達到中度敏感,絕大多數(shù)類型的核心區(qū)及其緩沖區(qū)處于中高度敏感性水平,且從核心區(qū)到緩沖區(qū)高度敏感性面積占比呈現(xiàn)增長趨勢;由于自然和人為活動雙重作用影響,整個自然保護區(qū)中度以下低彈性區(qū)域面積比超過70%,從核心區(qū)到外部實驗區(qū),極低度彈性的空間范圍不斷增大,保護區(qū)60%以上區(qū)域應(yīng)加強植被恢復(fù);根據(jù)景觀空間彈性表現(xiàn),10.53%的區(qū)域需要重點保護,這些區(qū)域分布在保護功能區(qū)C區(qū)東部、E區(qū)西北部和D、E兩區(qū)交匯地帶。景觀空間彈性框架及其概念化模型能綜合考慮景觀格局穩(wěn)定性和景觀空間生態(tài)敏感性,這對評價認識草原類自然保護地景觀空間彈性特征、有針對性地制定草原植被恢復(fù)方案和優(yōu)化保護功能區(qū)具有積極的指導(dǎo)作用。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the effect of grassland vegetation restoration and understand the elastic characteristics of grassland ecosystem, Xilin Gole League Grassland National Nature Reserve was taken as the object, supported by ArcGIS, Fragstats and other software, a conceptual landscape spatial elasticity model (LSR) was established from three factors: landscape pattern stability (LPS), landscape ecological sensitivity (LES) and human disturbance, and the landscape spatial ecological sensitivity and resistance characteristics of the study area were analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that the stability of forest and grassland landscape pattern was higher at the class level, especially in the core zone,but the LPS value was far lower than the theoretical optimal value, and the stability level of landscape pattern needed to be improved. The ecological sensitivity of nearly 60% of the protected areas was moderately sensitive, and the majority of the core zones and their buffer zones were at the medium and high sensitivity level, and the ratio of the highly sensitive areas from the core zones to the buffer zones showed an increasing trend. Due to the dual effects of natural and man-made activities, the area ratio of low-elasticity areas below the moderate level in the whole nature reserve was over 70%, from core zone to external experimental zone, the range of extremely low resistance space was increasing, and vegetation restoration should be strengthened in more than 60% of protected areas. According to the spatial resistance of landscape, 10.53% of the areas needed to be protected, which was distributed in the eastern part of the protected functional zone C, northwestern part of zone E and the intersection of the zone D and zone E. The landscape spatial resistance framework and its conceptual model can comprehensively consider the stability and ecological sensitivity of the landscape pattern, and had positive guidance for evaluating and recognizing the landscape spatial resistance characteristics of grassland natural reserves, formulating grassland vegetation restoration plan and optimizing protection function areas.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

趙方博,岳德鵬,楊曉瀟,于強,蘇凱,屈志強.典型草原自然保護地景觀空間彈性GIS評價[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機械學(xué)報,2019,50(6):209-217. ZHAO Fangbo, YUE Depeng, YANG Xiaoxiao, YU Qiang, SU Kai, QU Zhiqiang. Evaluation of Spatial Elasticity of Landscape in Typical Grassland Nature Reserve by GIS[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2019,50(6):209-217.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2019-06-10
  • 出版日期: